Despite Real Madrid’s dramatic 1-0 win over the Athletic Club, the club’s official channel, Real Madrid TV chose not to focus on the two referee controversies that ignite the anger within the club and its supporters.
The first incident he revealed was the rejected target of Vinnius Junior in the 80th minute.
The strike was dismissed by Andrek for an offset, which was asked to intervene by a few centimeters in the build-up-the tip of his boot is clearly sufficient to trigger the groom call.
According to Real Madrid TV AsParticularly expressed deep doubts on the VAR system used about frame selection in semi-automatic offside technology.
“Where is the ball in semi-liberated? It does not appear. You just have to believe it,” He said, questioning the transparency of the system.
“And how we are going to consider this system with the direction of the mediapro by Close Gomez, what we see after the week is it impossible.”
Second incident
Real Madrid was not happy with the referee decisions. (Photo by Florensia Tan June/Getty Image)
The second flashpoint was a potential punishment on Jude Bellingham, which appeared in the box brought down by Uni Nunez.
For Real Madrid’s displeasure, VAR authorities opted for not reviewing the incident. Real Madrid TV did not tell words:
“This is the third world. It is usually laughing at football fans and especially real Madrid fans.”
On Bellingham Penalty, the channel echoed the remarks after Carlo Anselotti’s match about “The New Football”, which refer to the decisions that do not go against Real Madrid much.
“If Kaimvinga’s contact in Pamplona was a punishment after the ball was already a punishment, why was it not a one on Earth? Martinez Munuira had already given us a title before, and now he was close A double scoring. ,
Barcelona clash
To add fuel to the fire, he brought Barcelona’s match against Kelta Vigo, which he saw as double standards in the referee.
He was particularly a failure about Rafinha, claiming that he should have been sent to an alleged elbow on the Eyago Aspas, and also questioned the time of the fine given to Baraka’s Dani Olmo.
“The most obvious footage of the alleged attack came out only after the match. During the game, it was easily unavailable,” He claimed, suggested manipulation or prejudice.
Make fun of the conversation
Real Madrid defeated the athletic club. (Photo by Florensia Tan June/Getty Image)
After the CTA released the VAR audio of the Vineasius Dislind Gol, Real Madrid TV doubled on their allegations. He made fun of the conversation between the officials and used the language:
“This is Umpteenth joke from Medina Cantalazo. They are disqualified by profession but are still rewarded.
“This is why FIFA has not called any spanis for the club World Cup. Either they are not quite good, or FIFA they suspect, as we do.”
In a closed jab filled with satire, the presenter joked:
“They tell us that Var Room is still reviewing the target of Valverde … maybe they will find a way to reject it.”
This furious response to real Madrid’s in-house media indicates not only disappointment with personal decisions but also the growing mistrust of the VAR system.
Now boiling with stress, this is unlikely to be final that we hear from the Capital Club on refereeing cases.